home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: mordred.cc.jyu.fi!news
- From: daeron@horus.co.jyu.fi (Aki Laukkanen)
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.misc
- Subject: Re: Speed: 68040 vs. 68060
- Date: 5 Mar 1996 09:12:58 GMT
- Organization: University of Jyvaskyla, Finland
- Message-ID: <594.6637T1163T1943@horus.co.jyu.fi>
- References: <38232529@kone.fipnet.fi> <1022.6629T185T1619@netspace.net.au>
- <38232692@kone.fipnet.fi> <1126.6636T65T634@netspace.net.au>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: dynamic02.co.jyu.fi
- X-Newsreader: THOR 2.22 (Amiga;TCP/IP) *UNREGISTERED*
-
-
- >Actually, I've read the 060 can do up to three, and the 040 doesn't get 1
- >instruction per cycle, unfortunately. Maybe on some instructions, but
- >certainly not on all. That would be the equivalent of a RISC design..?
-
- So? The question was about peak performance anyway..
-
- >I wasn't talking about his 060, I was talking about his 040, which he claimed
- >made 40 MIPS at 40Mhz, when no board I've seen does more than about 30MIPS
- >with SysInfo at 40Mhz.
-
- And no 060/50 will do 100 MIPS with Sysinfo (pun intended :). Well, not with
- any other MIPS tester either if they're not dumb.
-
- --
- Daeron
-
-